a.) I suppose as I have written the annotation already with the somehow hidden intention to highlight the points important to me the will give me a better idea about the article in question, than the original snapshot, which was partially the text accompanying the url and partially the text abstract.
b.) For an external user the originally annotation would probably serve better as kind of point of information. Reasons here for are that by focussing a little bit on the use of the article to inform myself in respect of a specific topic/theme the information might become biased to him. Furthermore I consider my annotations a bit to long for normal use.
Abonnieren
Kommentare zum Post (Atom)
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen